2027 UERU Annual Conference Call for Participants

Theme Title

Insert paragraph or perhaps two-paragraph description here 

The paragraph (s) will help to fill in the gap. 

Timeline

July 1, 2026: Submissions Open

August 17, 2026: Proposal Deadline

September 16, 2026: Acceptance Notification 

Suggested Session Topics/Tracks

  • Academic Advising 

  • Curricular Analytics 

  • Grading Reform 

  • Inclusive Excellence  

  • Strategic Enrollment Management 

  • Teaching and Learning  

  • Transforming Math Education 

  • Undergraduate Research – High Impact Practices 

  • Undergraduate STEM Education  

  • World Readiness 

Proposal Submission

Submit proposals by August 17, 2026, for full consideration for the 2027 Annual Conference program. 

Proposals will be reviewed by the 2027 Annual Conference Planning Committee:

  • Linda Adler-Kassner, Associate Vice Chancellor of Teaching and Learning, Faculty Director, Center for Innovative Teaching, Research, and Learning, Distinguished Professor of Writing Studies, University of California Santa Barbara 

  • William B. Davis, Vice Provost for Academic Engagement and Student Achievement, Washington State University 

  • Steven Girardot, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education and Student Success, Georgia Tech 

  • Gwen GorzelskyVice Provost for Academic Initiatives, University of Idaho 

  • Brad Petitfils, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education and Student Success, Chapman University  

  • Hillary Procknow, Vice Provost for Undergraduate Education, University of Nevada 

  • Nikos Varelas, Senior Vice Provost for Academic Programs, Student Success, and Effectiveness, University of Illinois Chicago 

  • Cassandra Volpe Horii, Associate Vice Provost for Education and, Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning, Stanford University 

      Please submit questions about the proposal process to the UERU Home Office staff at homeoffice@ueru.org

      Note: as per usual, presenters must register to participate in the conference. Presenters will be notified of registration deadlines along with acceptance notifications.

      Session Formats

      UERU encourages presenters to submit proposals that employ innovative formats that engage participants in active learning, such as the below options. While traditional panel presentations are also welcome, active and participatory learning sessions are a hallmark of UERU events. 

      Fishbowl Discussion

      • What it is: A fishbowl turns a panel or lecture into a living conversation. A small group of 4–6 people sits in an inner circle and discusses a topic while the rest of the attendees observe from an outer circle. At regular intervals — or when someone from the outer circle wants to contribute — one seat in the inner circle opens up and a new voice joins the discussion. 

      • How it flows: The session facilitator opens with a brief framing of the topic (5 minutes or less), then invites the initial inner circle to begin discussing. The facilitator manages transitions, keeps the conversation on track, and may pose questions to prompt new directions. Near the end, the full group debriefs together. 

      • Why it works: It creates the intimacy and depth of a small group conversation while keeping the full audience engaged — observers are watching a real discussion unfold, not a rehearsed presentation. Because anyone can rotate in, attendees stay alert and invested. 

      • Tips for developing your Fishbowl Discussion proposal: 

        • Come with 3–4 provocative or open-ended questions to seed the conversation. 

        • Choose an inner circle that represents a range of perspectives or experience levels. 

        • Leave at least 10–15 minutes at the end for full-group reflection. 

      Popcorn / Pop-Up Discussion 

      • What it is: A popcorn discussion is a fast-paced, energizing format where participants "pop up" to share thoughts, reactions, or ideas spontaneously — much like popcorn kernels firing off at random. Rather than raising hands and waiting to be called on, attendees jump in when they feel ready, creating a conversation that feels natural and momentum-driven. The facilitator poses a question or shows a provocative statement, image, or short clip, and the room responds organically. It's a simple technique that can dramatically increase participation, even among people who might hesitate to speak up in a more formal setting. 

      • How it flows: The facilitator opens with a brief framing of the topic and explains the format — including the norm that participants should pop in whenever they're ready, without waiting for permission (5 minutes or less). A question or prompt is posed, and participants begin contributing spontaneously. The facilitator's role is light — mostly listening, occasionally reflecting a theme back to the group, and posing follow-up prompts to keep energy going or shift direction. The session closes with a brief synthesis where the facilitator (or the group) names key themes or takeaways from what surfaced. 

      • Why it works: The informal, permission-free structure lowers the barrier to participation. People speak when they feel genuinely ready rather than feeling put on the spot, which tends to produce more authentic contributions. The format also creates a sense of collective energy — as more people pop up, others feel more comfortable joining in. It works especially well early in a session to quickly surface the range of perspectives in the room. 

      • Tips for developing your Popcorn/Pop-Up Discussion proposal: 

        • Your opening prompt is everything. Make it specific enough to focus the conversation, but open enough that there's no single "right" answer — you want people to have genuine reactions, not search for the correct response. 

        • Plan for 3–4 prompts across the session so you can take the conversation deeper in stages rather than exhausting a single question. 

        • Set a brief norm at the start: contributions should be short (a sentence or two), so the discussion stays lively and more voices can be heard. This keeps it from turning into a series of mini-speeches. 

        • Popcorn discussion pairs well with other formats — consider using it as a warm-up to a fishbowl or as a way to open up a skills lab before the hands-on activity begins. 

      Poster Presentation

      • What it is: A poster presentation is a format in which researchers or practitioners share their work visually through a designed poster display, then engage in direct, one-on-one or small group conversation with interested attendees during a dedicated session. All poster presenters stand with their posters simultaneously while attendees move freely through the spacestopping to read, ask questions, and have informal conversations with authors. It combines the rigor of formal research presentation with the accessibility and warmth of a personal conversation — attendees get to go deep on the topics that matter most to them, and presenters get to engage with genuinely curious audiences rather than a room full of passive listeners. 

      • How it flows: During the dedicated poster session, all presenters are stationed at their posters and attendees circulate at their own pace. There is no formal program or schedule within the session itself — the flow is self-directed. Presenters offer a brief, informal overview of their work to each new visitor (typically 2–3 minutes), then open up to questions and discussion. Conversations can go as deep as the attendee and presenter want to take them. A session coordinator or emcee may open and close the session for the full group, but the heart of the format is the individual exchanges happening throughout the room simultaneously. 

      • Why it works: Poster sessions democratize the conference experience in a unique way. Attendees are in control of their own learning — they choose which work to engage with and how long to linger. Presenters benefit from repeated, focused conversations that often surface questions and connections they hadn't considered. The informal atmosphere also tends to lower barriers on both sides, making it easier for early-career researchers or practitioners to share their work and for attendees to ask the questions they might hesitate to raise in a formal session. 

      • Tips for preparing your Poster Presentation: 

        • Design your poster to be readable and engaging on its own, without you standing next to it. The posters will be displayed throughout the entire conference so attendees may stop to see them at any time, and a well-organized visual tells the story clearly at a glance. Lead with your key finding or takeaway, not your methodology. 

        • Prepare a short, conversational summary of your work that you can deliver in 2–3 minutes to someone with no prior context. You'll give this overview many times during the session, so practice making it feel fresh and natural each time. 

        • Bring something to facilitate follow-up — a QR code linking to your full paper or data, a one-page summary handout, or simply a sign-up sheet for people who want to stay in touch. 

        • Embrace the conversation. The best poster sessions feel less like presentations and more like collegial exchanges. Come with questions for your visitors as much as answers — their reactions and experiences are valuable data too. 

      Roundtable Discussion 

      • What it is: A roundtable is an intimate, facilitated conversation where a small group of 8–10 participants — including 1–2 facilitators — gathers to explore a topic together as genuine peers. Unlike a panel, where a few experts present to a passive audience, a roundtable assumes that everyone at the table has relevant experience or perspective to contribute. The facilitator's job is not to deliver content but to guide the conversation, draw out quieter voices, and help the group move toward insight together. The relatively small size creates a level of depth and candor that larger formats rarely achieve. 

      • How it flows: The facilitator opens with a brief framing of the topic and a round of quick introductions — just enough for participants to know who is in the room and what lens they bring (5–10 minutes). From there, the facilitator poses an opening question and lets the conversation develop, stepping in periodically to redirect, deepen, or synthesize. If there are two facilitators, one might lead the discussion while the other tracks themes, manages time, or monitors for voices that haven't yet been heard. The session closes with a structured synthesis — participants name one key insight or takeaway, which the facilitator weaves into a brief closing reflection. 

      • Why it works: The small group size creates psychological safety — people are more willing to share honestly, ask questions, or admit uncertainty when they're not performing for a large audience. It also means every participant is likely to speak multiple times, which deepens engagement and investment in the conversation. Roundtables are particularly well suited to complex, nuanced topics where lived experience matters as much as expertise. 

      • Tips for developing your Roundtable Discussion proposal: 

        • Be thoughtful about how participants are recruited or selected. A roundtable works best when there is a meaningful diversity of perspective, role, or experience around the table — too much homogeneity and the conversation can flatten quickly. 

        • Prepare more questions than you think you'll need, but hold them loosely. A good roundtable will often take unexpected turns, and the best facilitators follow the energy of the room rather than sticking rigidly to a script. 

        • If using two facilitators, define your roles clearly in advance. Having one person lead and one person observe and synthesize is a particularly effective division of labor. 

        • Consider what happens to the conversation after the session ends. Roundtables often generate rich insights that the broader conference audience never hears — think about whether you want to capture key themes on a shared document, report out to the full group, or publish a summary afterward. 

      Workshop / Skills Lab 

      • What it is: A skills lab flips the traditional session model: instead of presenting information for attendees to absorb, the facilitator guides participants through an activity that lets them experience or practice something directly. Learning happens by doing, and the debrief conversation that follows tends to be far richer because everyone has a shared experience to draw from. 

      • How it flows: The facilitator opens with a brief framing — just enough context for participants to dive in (5–10 minutes). The bulk of the session is the hands-on activity itself, which might be individual, paired, or done in small groups. The facilitator circulates, coaches, and prompts reflection. The session closes with a structured debrief where participants share what they noticed, struggled with, or discovered. 

      • Why it works: People retain far more from doing than from listening. A well-designed activity also surfaces questions and challenges that a lecture never would — participants discover what they don't know in real time. 

      • Tips for developing your Workshop/Skills Lab proposal: 

        • Be specific about what participants will actually do during the session. The activity is the heart of the proposal. 

        • Design the activity so it can work at different skill levels — not everyone in the room will have the same background. 

        • Build in more debrief time than you think you need. Facilitators often underestimate how much participants want to share after a good activity. 

      World Café

      • What it is: A World Café transforms a room into a series of small, simultaneous conversations that build on each other over time. Tables of 4–5 people each explore a different but related question, then participants rotate to new tables, cross-pollinating ideas as they go. The result is a rich, layered discussion that draws on the collective knowledge of everyone in the room. 
      • How it flows: The facilitator briefly introduces the overall theme and explains the format (5 minutes). Participants have 15–20 minutes at each table before rotating. A "table hoststays behind at each table to welcome newcomers and summarize the prior conversation. After two or three rotations, everyone reconvenes and table hosts (or volunteers) share key themes with the full group. 
      • Why it works: Everyone talks, which means everyone is engaged. The rotating structure prevents any one voice from dominating and encourages attendees to build on each other's thinking rather than starting from scratch each time. 

      • Tips for developing your World Café proposal: 

        • Design your table questions so they are distinct but connected — each one should illuminate a different facet of the same core topic. 

        • Provide paper or sticky notes at each table so participants can capture ideas for the next group. 

        • Plan for a synthesis moment at the end — this is where the real insight often emerges. 

      FAQ

      Yes, we welcome proposals from all engaged in equity/excellence in work in undergraduate education at research institutions regardless of UERU membership. Please be aware, however, that there is a higher 2027 UERU Annual Conference registration rate for nonmember participants than for UERU member participants. 

      Yes, proposals to UERU are reviewed by the 2027 UERU Annual Conference Planning Committee separately from AAC&U’s review process. 

      Yes, all presenters for 2027 UERU Annual Conference sessions are required to register for the UERU 2027 Annual Conference, with registration fees paid in full. The registration deadline is December 31, 2026.

      Please be aware that 2027 UERU Annual Conference registration is separate from AAC&U Annual Meeting registration; presenters are welcome to register for both events but must have a confirmed registration for the 2027 UERU Annual Conference to appear on the Conference program. Registrants for the 2027 UERU Annual Conference will receive a code for a discounted registration for the AAC&U Annual Meeting.

      We ask that all submissions be entered in our Proposal Submission Form. If you have supplemental information (not required) to provide beyond the requested form fields, you will see the instructions at the end of the form for submitting additional documents.

      Proposals must be submitted by 11:59pm ET on August 17, 2026, for full consideration by the committee.

      2027 UERU Annual Conference Concurrent sessions will be 50 minutes in length, with a 10-minute break between sessions.  

      Based on feedback from previous Conference attendees, we encourage presenters to allocate time for Q&A or other interaction with and among attendees as part of your program; our recommendation is at least 15-20 minutes of audience discussion/interaction for each presentation.

      The Committee and Home Office Team will develop a program that utilizes a variety of session formats to maximize the attendees’ experience and learning opportunities. UERU encourages presenters to submit proposals that employ innovative formats that engage participants in active learning. While traditional panel presentations are also welcome, active and participatory learning sessions are a hallmark of UERU events.

      Examples:

      • Fishbowl Discussion
      • Popcorn / Pop-up Discussion
      • Posters Presentation
      • Roundtable Talks
      • Workshop / Skill Labs
      • World Café

      We cannot provide an exact number at this time, as we are still finalizing the details of the 2027 UERU Annual Conference schedule.

      In previous years, UERU has received more proposals than we have been able to accept due to the limits of time and meeting space. Highly rated proposals that we are unable to accept for in-person presentations may be offered the opportunity to present their research in a poster display.

      All proposers will receive notice of the committee's decision by September 17, 2026.